New college trend: Go trayless

Cafteria trayDuring the past couple of years, colleges have undertaken a variety of initiatives to promote sustainability on their campuses. Selling local produce and other foods in campus cafes, providing free CFLs, and the option to purchase green energy to power dormitory rooms are just a few examples of the ways in which colleges have sought to be greener. However perhaps the fast growing trend on college campuses is the banishment of the humble food tray, or trayless dining. Now, instead of providing trays for students to load with plates, glasses, and silverware, many cafeterias have done away with the large plastic slabs. Trayless dining discourages food waste, conserves water, and decreases energy use while saving colleges money.

Some campuses have already found that trayless dining cuts food waste up to 50%. The thinking is that, without the convenience of a tray, diners are less likely to get up for seconds or thirds that they won’t be able to finish. Forgoing trays also saves thousands of dollars in energy that would be expended sanitizing trays.

Of course, one might imagine that there would be some resistance to removing the trays from cafeterias; carrying an entree, salad, silverware and beverage without one requires considerable skill. Consequently many colleges have decided to ease their students into the practice by banishing trays from select dining areas, or only on “trayless Tuesdays.” It turns out though, that some students prefer the new system, stating that it creates a less institutional, more “homey” atmosphere in the dining hall.

The Sustainable Endowments Institute (SEI), a research organization located in Cambridge, tracks and compares environmental practices at the 300 colleges and universities with the largest endowments. Of the institutions studied, the SEI reports that 126 of them have cut down on the use of trays, if not eliminated them completely.

With increasing food costs, compounded by contracted endowments, the trayless dining trend will most likely become even more popular this fall.

The meat and climate debate

Sunrise on the farm

In a recent Washington Post article, the climate change debate was brought to a new level: what about meat?  Politicians and environmental activists alike argue over cap-and-trade, mitigation, adaptation, and hybrid cars, but what about the energy used and green house gases (GHG) emitted from intensive livestock practices (factory farms) across the nation, and around the world? The Post article cited a 2006 United Nations report stating 18 percent of global GHG emissions comes from livestock. Never mind the hundreds of thousands of acres of land stripped and cleared for cattle-grazing in Brazil’s Amazon rainforest and the American West, to name just two major regions. The Amazon rainforest in particular acts as a major carbon sink on our planet, storing large volumes of CO2 from the atmosphere. Diminishing this capacity increases the precariousness of our situation.

So, is switching to a vegetarian or vegan diet all that impactful?  Interestingly, a study out of the University of Chicago noted switching to a vegan diet is more environmentally friendly than owning a Prius. Still, not everyone is comfortable giving up meat in their diet. At the very least however, cutting back a little, or buying locally raised meat can cut emissions significantly, and promote local farm production and sustainability. So next time, take a second look at that hamburger you ate for lunch and think global climate change; they’re more directly related than you may think.

Recycling Soda Cans into Solar Panels

Soda can

From Canada comes the rather amazing story of Cansolair, a company that reuses soda cans to make solar panels. Once installed, this soda/solar unit can provide up to 30% of the heating for your house. All this in the cloudy, foggy Labrador region. All without adding another CO2 particle to the environment. Maybe Coke knew it was onto something when they introduced this new flavor last year.

Check out this video to see how it’s done.

Diet for a Small (Hot) Planet

Don’t have the cash for a new hybrid? Did you know that you can reduce your carbon footprint by the same amount as driving a hybrid by simply eating less meat? Well, now you do.

In 1971 Frances Moore Lappé wrote the vegetarian best-seller Diet for a Small Planet which hi-lighted the agricultural inefficiency of meat eating. (On average, it takes eight pounds of vegetable protein to generate a pound of animal protein.) As global warming has become a hot issue, that agricultural inefficiency is being measured with a new yardstick— the carbon footprint of meat.

As the food writer Marc Bittman writes in the New York Times article Re-thinking the Meat Guzzler.

To put the energy-using demand of meat production into easy-to-understand terms, Gidon Eshel, a geophysicist at the Bard Center, and Pamela A. Martin, an assistant professor of geophysics at the University of Chicago, calculated that if Americans were to reduce meat consumption by just 20 percent it would be as if we all switched from a standard sedan — a Camry, say — to the ultra-efficient Prius. Similarly, a study last year by the National Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science in Japan estimated that 2.2 pounds of beef is responsible for the equivalent amount of carbon dioxide emitted by the average European car every 155 miles, and burns enough energy to light a 100-watt bulb for nearly 20 days.

Something to chew on, don’t you think?